Roasting Defects
In the work that I have done in education within the coffee roasting community, I’ve found that there is one comical challenge that we constantly face. That is clarity of communication. Part of the reason is that despite tremendous efforts by the SCA, there is a lack of agreement within the industry regarding what certain words mean. Recently, I’ve been noticing this surrounding terminology for roasting defects. So, I wanted to create a quick TL;DR cheat sheet for vocabulary regarding objective and subjective roasting defects to bring clarity. I will use terminology that I think is descriptive and link it with current SCA terminology.
OBJECTIVE PHYSICAL DEFECTS
Tipping
Early Roast Scorching
Late Roast Scorching
Chipping
SUBJECTIVE ROASTING DEFECTS
It’s worth noting that I will likely not post photos as these defects are… well… subjective. I happily advise clients about what I consider to fit these descriptions in my roasting training sessions or classes, but there is too much subtlety and nuance to get into writing it here. Also, many of them come in pairs, so that is how I will write about them. If someone uses a subjective roasting defect to describe your coffee, it just means they didn’t like it. 🤷🏻 Ultimately, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Over and Under Developed Coffees
When we are referring to under and over-developed coffees, we are specifically addressing the length of time from the beginning of the first crack to the end of the roast. If someone suggests your coffee is underdeveloped, it probably means that it was too: vegetal, metallic, acidic, bright, or grainy for them. If they suggest it is overdeveloped, then they are finding it to be too: flat, low-acid, chocolaty, roasty, or dull for their tastes.
Over and Under Roasted Coffees
Separate from development time, this focuses on the end temperature, end color, or maybe end weight-loss percentage that was chosen for the coffee. Someone suggesting that your coffee is over-roasted likely means it is too: chocolaty, smokey, or roasty for their taste preferences. If they point to it as being under-roasted, then they likely find it to be too: grainy, vegetal, or acidic.
Baked
This one is so rife with nuance and caveats that I won’t touch it with a ten-foot pole here. Sufficed to say, if someone says that your coffee is baked, they mean they don’t like it. I feel like there are so many variations within our industry of how different people describe the phenomena of “baked” coffee that it has become virtually meaningless, so I generally try not to use this terminology. Instead, I focus on all of the other terms listed above.